The bridge which is submerged in the water is roughly meters wide and up to 10 metres in depth. Scientists have found marine terraces which had a steeper descending slope on the seaward side near the Rameswaram islands. Suspecting tectonic activity which could have caused the submarine landslide and vertical slopes in the region, they took samples at three places including one sample on the slope of the bridge. The water depth at the slope was metres and the core sample was taken for 1. Since the shell-shaped fossils are rare to find on the east coast of India, scientists wanted to find out the time period of the fossils. These fossils are also very sensitive to the climate and environmental changes and major incidents like tsunami or earthquake can wipe out its population. The lab has determined the age of fossil using Carbon dating method. The method uses organic remains of the fossil to find out the time period of its death. The results showed that the fossils found between 94 cm and cm were at least 18, years old.
According to ancient Indian legend, King Rama built a bridge between India and Sri Lanka more than a million years ago. Some have looked at NASA satellite images and noted what looks like the remnants of such a bridge. The question is whether it is man-made or a natural formation. The truth of its origin is buried in political and religious controversy. Some have wanted to destroy the remnants of the bridge to open up a shipping channel.
‘I am not aware of any carbon dating either,’ said NASA spokesman as Ram Setu in India – carbon dated as being million years old.
An American science channel on Tuesday restarted the debate on the Ram Setu, saying that there exists evidence suggesting that the bridge connecting India and Sri Lanka was man-made not natural. Science Channel , as part of a promo for an upcoming show titled What on Earth , has interviewed an archaeologist who says, “The rocks on top of the sand actually pre-date the sand.
So there is more to the story. This adds credence to the Hindu mythological text in the Ramayana which claims that the Ram Setu bridge was constructed under the guidance of Lord Rama. Are the ancient Hindu myths of a land bridge connecting India and Sri Lanka true? Scientific analysis suggests they are. WhatonEarth pic.
Rameshwaram – Where The Monkey Army Builds The Ram Setu
The show puts the spotlight once again on the Ram Setu by quoting American archaeologists who say the km stretch — between Pamban Island near Rameshwaram in India and Mannar Island off Sri Lanka — is man-made. The promo has got more than 1. A shipping canal project proposed by the UPA-I government in that would have required dredging the area and damaging the formation was opposed by the BJP-led NDA, which is expected to file an affidavit against project in the Supreme Court later this month.
Satellite imagery show formations that scientists believe are limestone shoals.
Mandir wahin baneyenge, par date nahin batayenge (You say you will make the Maharashtra has built Ram Setu (bridge) to Ayodhya.
The show quotes a few American geologists, archaeologists and scientists as saying that the Ram Setu, which connects Pamban Island near Rameshwaram in India to Mannar Island off Sri Lanka, was actually man-made. It has been viewed 1,90, times on Twitter till now. The promo tweet reads, “Are the ancient Hindu myths of a land bridge connecting India and Sri Lanka true? Scientific analysis suggests they are.
Are the ancient Hindu myths of a land bridge connecting India and Sri Lanka true? WhatonEarth pic. So there is more to the story. In fact, according to the research by the American scientists quoted by the channel, the stones were dated to be nearly 7, years whereas the sand on which they are situated was only 4, years old. These data suggest that the structure captured on the satellite image is not natural, the narrator of the show informs the audience.
The purported findings have already sparked a political debate in the country with BJP leaders questioning the Congress previous stand where the party had told the Supreme Court that there was no historical proof that Lord Rama had existed. In , the UPA-1 government had proposed a shipping canal project that would have dredged the area and damaged the formation, referred to as the RamSetu by Hindu organisations.
The project was thus challenged by the BJP in the apex court. Times Now. Follow us on :.
Ram Setu confirmed as man-made by US TV show: 7000-year-old rocks on 4000-year-old sand busts myth
Ram Setu is in news again, 10 years after the then Congress -led UPA government at the Centre had submitted an affidavit in the Supreme Court, arguing that Valmiki Ramayana, which mentions Ram Setu built by Lord Rama, lacked scientific and historical veracity. The promo of an upcoming programme on Discovery Science Channel shows Ram Setu is man-made and not natural. The channel quotes an archaeologist that the rocks on top of sand pre-date the sand.
The project remained part of election manifestos of parties in many elections.
Wot ram ii matchmaking. Your article rama was nala setu, this pattern. Science channel says that no more than an event that took place to. German scientist.
The experts concluded – citing images from a NASA satellite and other evidence – that the incongruity in the age of the sand and the stones proves that the stone bridge must have been built by human beings. He has previously filed a petition in the court opposing any alteration to the bridge. The project proposed creating an kilometer-long deepwater that would involve extensive dredging and removal of the limestone shoals.
A feasibility study showed that completion of the project would cut travelling by about nautical miles and also save 10 to 30 hours of sailing time. Furthermore, it would bring down shipping costs and add to India’s exchequer in the form of transit fees instead of circumnavigating Sri Lanka. Expectedly, the project was condemned by a wide spectrum of people.
While environmentalists averred that it would destabilize the aquatic flora and fauna of the area, some activists questioned its economic viability. The most strident criticism, however, came from the BJP and right-wing Hindu groups which wanted Ram Setu to be declared a national monument as it was a matter of faith. In , the Congress government submitted before the Supreme Court that there was no scientific evidence to prove the bridge was man-made but subsequently withdrew its affidavit following the volley of protests and given the religious sentiments involved in the issue.
Not only Hindus, Ram Setu is equally sacred to Muslims and Christians
In a promotional video released on Tuesday by Discovery Communications-owned Science Channel, said that its explorers have found that the bridge located between the landmass of India and Sri Lanka appears to be man-made. The debate about this structure has been ongoing for some time and the controversy about Setu Samudram Project seems to have been laid to rest now with this new discovery.
According to this promotional video Ram Setu is a real man-made bridge that connects India and Sri Lanka.
Rameshwaram, the land of Lord Rama, is not only Tamil Nadu’s main pilgrimage town, but also one of the Char Dhams (four pilgrimage spots).
Geological evidence suggests that this bridge is a former land connection between India and Sri Lanka. The bridge is 50 km long and separates the Gulf of Mannar south-west from the Palk Strait northeast. Some of the sandbanks are dry and the sea in the area is very shallow, being only 1 to 10 metres deep in places, which hinders navigation. It was reportedly passable on foot up to the 15th century until storms deepened the channel: temple records seem to say that Adam’s Bridge was completely above sea level until it broke in a cyclone in More information is available on Wikipedia.
Our tour around the world in focuses over Adam’s Bridge today, which connects India and Sri Lanka. The aim of these images acquired by Landsat 5 and 8 in and , is to show the remnants of this land bridge that connected India and Sri Lanka. Until , Sri Lanka and India were connected by a land bridge called Adam’s Bridge, which made it possible to move easily from one country to another.
This natural bridge was destroyed by a terrible cyclone. Since then, even ships can no longer transit in that stretch of sea, known as the Strait of Palk, in the Indian Ocean, because the seabed is too low.
Ram Setu bandhan
There is nothing like Ram Sethu. No bridge is there. You can visit the beach only. Near to Rameshwaram around 22 kms The sea is beautiful Very clean water Locals have now started to sell things Coconut water will refresh u.. To see Rama sethu, one has to take 4×4 or van and travel through sand dunes and shallow water and reach land’s end at Dhanushkodi.
the formation commonly known as Adam’s Bridge or Ram Setu which per the radio carbon dating on the drilled samples, the sea level was.
A two-and-a-half-minute video tweeted by Science Channel on December 11 has being widely circulated as fresh evidence to support the theory that a rock formation in the Bay of Bengal off the coast of Rameswaram is actually the bridge that Lord Ram and his army built to reach Sri Lanka, as described in the Ramayana. The video essentially makes two claims. And two, that these rocks do not belong there and have been brought from somewhere else, possibly by a human agency.
They are part of the commentary in the video. The promotional video cites no sources or studies. The basis for the claims will perhaps be known once the full episode is broadcast. It is best to wait until then. However, none of the several Indian oceanographers and geologists that The Indian Express spoke to over Wednesday and Thursday were aware of any new published material in any peer-reviewed journal that would support these assertions.
Several of them had seen the video, and they said it raised more questions than answers. While no scientific attempt has been made to date the rocks or the sand at the site, the claim that the rocks could be 7, years old is not entirely implausible, said C P Rajendran, a geologist with the Bengaluru-based Jawaharlal Nehru Centre for Advanced Scientific Research.
However, like Dr Nigam, Prof Rajendran, too, said it was difficult to believe any claim in the absence of dating methodology and other information. Dr Nigam, incidentally, had carried out a study in the mids on the changes in sea levels over time. That study had shown that about 7, years ago, the sea level in that area was on average at least 2 metres lower than the current average level of about 3 metres.
Ram Setu not a natural formation but man-made! US TV show suggests citing scientists
As day broke, barrel-chested businessmen filed into the ocean, reciting mantras. Hindu priests, clad in white, dropped to their knees to lead funereal ceremonies for families who had lost an uncle, a father. A cluster of teenagers wandered over the dunes. For centuries, pilgrims from the Indian cities of Chennai, Mumbai and Patna, and a few from London, have traveled to the tip of a thumbnail island in southern India.
It is here that the Ramayana , a central epic for Hindus, says Lord Rama crossed a bridge called Rama Setu to rescue his wife Sita from the demon king Ravana in modern Sri Lanka, a contemporary distance of about 20 miles. The trip to Dhanushkodi is a bit easier for pilgrims today.
‘Ram Setu is an ancient Indian engineering marvel,’ HRD minister was an ancient Indian engineering feat that astonishes the world till date.
Ram Setu prevented the tsunami from advancing from Rameshwaram to Kerala. According to the specialists, a sea route may be prepared for navigation without damaging Ram Setu, by removing the barren sand heaps near village Mandapam between Rameshwaram and Dhanushkoti railway. This will not only give a shorter route for navigation but also protect the oldest man-made heritage. According to Hindu scriptures and belief, Lord Ram and his vaanar sena had built a setu bridge from Rameshwaram to Sri Lanka about 17 lacs 25 thousands years ago.
Setu Samudram [shipping canal project] is based on the notion that it is inevitable to break the Ram Setu for easy navigation. This will amount to damaging a monument of both, historical and religious importanceto Hindus.